Home > How is Sub-Saharan Africa Combating HIV/AIDS?
Published on
30th August, 2017
In general, education, promotion of (male) condom use and of sexual abstinence among unmarried people have been the modus operandi. Some countries are also addressing the psychosocial impact of the disease. However, efforts have been generally inadequate. In many cases, non-governmental organizations (NGOs) are leading HIV/AIDS control endeavors. While this is fine in the short run, Africa and its communities will need to assume responsibility and leadership in the future.
To address this issue, NGOs and governments are trying to “scale-up” HIV/AIDS intervention programs. Some of the main goals are to broaden outreach programs, improve training, reduce staff turnover, pool resources and create an environment that facilitates scaling-up of prevention efforts.
However, the work of NGOs may sometimes undermine the public health system. Skilled health care workers are leaving the public health sector in favor of much fairer remuneration practices associated with the NGO sector. The end result is an internal “brain drain” of human resources.
At the national level, HIV/AIDS is regarded as an uncontrolled epidemic. In a few cases, for example Uganda, results have been encouraging.
These are the exception rather than the rule. Control efforts are often hindered by lack of resources, political turmoil, violence, and focusing on other priorities. The role of multilateral lending agencies in destabilizing African economy is also important.
Community involvement is the key to the sustaining of HIV/AIDS programs. It facilitates broadening of activities, draws attention to affected groups and enhances services. Community members are often willing to invest their own resources, including money, labor, time, and materials, into HIV/AIDS related activities. Though interventions involving community members are more likely to be effective and sustainable, mobilizing the community is a challenge.
Behavior modification, including promotion of and empowerment to choose sexual abstinence among young people, as well as consistent and correct use of condoms, likely contributed to the reduction of HIV rates. Though Ghana still has a long way to go, the model provides an excellent example of how control can be kept.
Unfortunately, the population level behavioral response to HIV in Ghana does not apply to other populations. Furthermore, the practice of scaling up biomedical and risk reduction elements may not reduce sexual transmission in the population. A broad shift in health policy is needed, with a special attention payed to epidemiological surveillance and communication to stimulate risk avoidance
Ghana also became a role model in care and support of HIV/AIDS patients, even before availability of antiretroviral therapy. In 1994, Ghana established and spearheaded the provision of holistic care, including pain and symptoms control amongst HIV infected persons. This has probably led to a reduction of stigmatization and discrimination against HIV/AIDS patients.